Post by Bact PhD on Apr 20, 2022 21:03:55 GMT
Flori-DUH Legislature making plans to punishing the Mouse (a huge employer in the state) for speaking out against the recently signed bill known as “Don’t Say ‘Gay’ “.
www.tallahassee.com/story/news/politics/2022/03/30/florida-gop-going-after-disney-dont-say-gay-criticism/7215673001/
Wait, aren’t corporations people, too??
Smells like… Free Speech for me, but not for thee.
Aaannnd they're Off (their rockers)! The legislation to (really, despite any claims otherwise) punish Disney for speaking out is drafted and passed by the Flori-DUH State Senate. Truth be told, it's all performance art for the benefit of the DeSantis 2022 Governor (and 2024 WH) campaigns -- red meat to The Base.
The Florida Senate voted Wednesday to strip the Walt Disney Company of special privileges in regulating and maintaining 38-square miles of Central Florida, home to its six theme parks and resorts.
The 23 to 16 vote on SB 4 came one day after Gov. Ron DeSantis said he wanted the Legislature to repeal the governing structure for Disney's Florida properties.
...
While lawmakers debated the measure, the DeSantis campaign for governor sent out a fundraising pitch declaring Disney had picked a fight with “the wrong guy” and for contributors “to join the fight against the Democratic machine and woke Disney executives.”
Democrats protested the Republicans' rush to punish the state’s largest private employer for political speech degraded the legislative process.
“With all due respect, this is not about meaningful legislative review. This is punishment. It is political theater, and we are better than this,” said Sen. Loranne Ausley, D-Tallahassee.
The measure by Sen. Jennifer Bradley, R-Green Cove, includes a carrot and stick approach in that it does not go into effect until June 2023, time enough for Disney, in the words of the House sponsor, Rep Randy Fine, R-Brevard, to reconsider its criticism of Florida law.
“This is kind of like parents putting their kids on restrictions. Clean up your act, apologize, say you're sorry, and agree to change your behavior. Maybe you'll get your phone back or your other privileges," observed Ausley.
At issue is the Reedy Creek Improvement District, a special district created in 1967 that provides Disney with unprecedented taxing and regulatory authority to build an entertainment empire that has grown into the world’s No. 1 tourism attraction.
The House and Senate sponsors of the repeal argue Disney is out of compliance with a 1997 law that required districts to seek recodification. Disney would have a year to get its paperwork in order and ask the Legislature to reauthorize Reedy Creek.
The 23 to 16 vote on SB 4 came one day after Gov. Ron DeSantis said he wanted the Legislature to repeal the governing structure for Disney's Florida properties.
...
While lawmakers debated the measure, the DeSantis campaign for governor sent out a fundraising pitch declaring Disney had picked a fight with “the wrong guy” and for contributors “to join the fight against the Democratic machine and woke Disney executives.”
Democrats protested the Republicans' rush to punish the state’s largest private employer for political speech degraded the legislative process.
“With all due respect, this is not about meaningful legislative review. This is punishment. It is political theater, and we are better than this,” said Sen. Loranne Ausley, D-Tallahassee.
The measure by Sen. Jennifer Bradley, R-Green Cove, includes a carrot and stick approach in that it does not go into effect until June 2023, time enough for Disney, in the words of the House sponsor, Rep Randy Fine, R-Brevard, to reconsider its criticism of Florida law.
“This is kind of like parents putting their kids on restrictions. Clean up your act, apologize, say you're sorry, and agree to change your behavior. Maybe you'll get your phone back or your other privileges," observed Ausley.
At issue is the Reedy Creek Improvement District, a special district created in 1967 that provides Disney with unprecedented taxing and regulatory authority to build an entertainment empire that has grown into the world’s No. 1 tourism attraction.
The House and Senate sponsors of the repeal argue Disney is out of compliance with a 1997 law that required districts to seek recodification. Disney would have a year to get its paperwork in order and ask the Legislature to reauthorize Reedy Creek.
And that 1997 law didn't matter diddly squat until the Supreme Emperor got criticized. At least two teams of lawyers will get a nice payday out of it. But wait, what about all that demonization of lawyers, and lawsuits, and all that by "conservative" politicians??