Post by LFC on Jan 30, 2023 17:40:43 GMT
The reich-wing continues pushing it's book banning. Notice that the gag orders have become more punitive. This isn't about a few books they don't like, this is about using the power of the state to intimidate people from saying anything these sickos don't like.
I’ve been very worried about the current wave of book bans. I haven’t been worried enough.
As state after state and town after town has made moves in recent years to over-regulate books, the issue has received a lot of media coverage. Alarmed, I’ve written about it (here and here). Still, until now, I haven’t allowed myself to become as alarmed as I should be. Frog-in-pot syndrome is one reason. Another may be that too much false comfort is swaddling the discussion. I want to strip away some of that here.
False Comfort: Book bans are a perennial school issue.
Yes, the main arena for the current wave of bans, as in the past, is schools, where the books being taught and shelved are up for debate. The number of these is exploding, as PEN America has been documenting. School librarians are under pressure to remove books, even displays — a Pennsylvania librarian was told to take down an Elie Wiesel quote he’d posted about the danger of silence. But this wave isn’t limited to schools. The same extremists targeting schools are targeting public libraries. Last week, North Dakota’s legislature began considering a bill requiring librarians to purge books deemed offensive or face prison time. Across the country, public libraries are being threatened with defunding and closure if they don’t remove certain books.
Banned book display at Columbia University, 1954
And it’s not just taxpayer-funded institutions: publishers and bookstores are being targeted. A Virginia state delegate filed a lawsuit against Simon and Schuster and sought a restraining order against Barnes and Noble to prevent them from selling a book to minors. The North Dakota bill would “charge any person who displays these materials at places that children visit.”
False Comfort: Book bans can seem like a red state problem.
Not so. PEN America, which has been tracking book bans and the educational censorship laws that make bans easier, reveals a spreading mania.
The broader, well-financed effort to intimidate educators and librarians is nationwide, as astroturf groups such as Moms For Liberty, with chapters in 37 states as of last summer, inspire and organize vocal minorities even in the bluest districts to stoke fear about books on social media and at school board meetings and to fuel school board runs on the fumes of these fears. And of course the right-wing media feeding panic about indoctrination knows no borders. The result: an increase in “soft censorship” and self-censorship, as Nadra Nittle explained in The 19th, that educators are susceptible to even if their state hasn’t passed draconian legislation.
A new Rand report, “Walking on Eggshells,” revealed a quarter of US teachers have made changes to instruction or curriculum, such as books and other texts and materials, in response to education censorship around race and gender. Importantly, 22% of teachers in districts without explicit restrictions reported making changes. The report used survey data from spring 2022. As more restrictions have been instituted since, today’s number would likely be higher. And it is principals in purple districts who reported the most political conflict and pressure in a recent UCLA survey.
As state after state and town after town has made moves in recent years to over-regulate books, the issue has received a lot of media coverage. Alarmed, I’ve written about it (here and here). Still, until now, I haven’t allowed myself to become as alarmed as I should be. Frog-in-pot syndrome is one reason. Another may be that too much false comfort is swaddling the discussion. I want to strip away some of that here.
False Comfort: Book bans are a perennial school issue.
Yes, the main arena for the current wave of bans, as in the past, is schools, where the books being taught and shelved are up for debate. The number of these is exploding, as PEN America has been documenting. School librarians are under pressure to remove books, even displays — a Pennsylvania librarian was told to take down an Elie Wiesel quote he’d posted about the danger of silence. But this wave isn’t limited to schools. The same extremists targeting schools are targeting public libraries. Last week, North Dakota’s legislature began considering a bill requiring librarians to purge books deemed offensive or face prison time. Across the country, public libraries are being threatened with defunding and closure if they don’t remove certain books.
Banned book display at Columbia University, 1954
And it’s not just taxpayer-funded institutions: publishers and bookstores are being targeted. A Virginia state delegate filed a lawsuit against Simon and Schuster and sought a restraining order against Barnes and Noble to prevent them from selling a book to minors. The North Dakota bill would “charge any person who displays these materials at places that children visit.”
False Comfort: Book bans can seem like a red state problem.
Not so. PEN America, which has been tracking book bans and the educational censorship laws that make bans easier, reveals a spreading mania.
The broader, well-financed effort to intimidate educators and librarians is nationwide, as astroturf groups such as Moms For Liberty, with chapters in 37 states as of last summer, inspire and organize vocal minorities even in the bluest districts to stoke fear about books on social media and at school board meetings and to fuel school board runs on the fumes of these fears. And of course the right-wing media feeding panic about indoctrination knows no borders. The result: an increase in “soft censorship” and self-censorship, as Nadra Nittle explained in The 19th, that educators are susceptible to even if their state hasn’t passed draconian legislation.
A new Rand report, “Walking on Eggshells,” revealed a quarter of US teachers have made changes to instruction or curriculum, such as books and other texts and materials, in response to education censorship around race and gender. Importantly, 22% of teachers in districts without explicit restrictions reported making changes. The report used survey data from spring 2022. As more restrictions have been instituted since, today’s number would likely be higher. And it is principals in purple districts who reported the most political conflict and pressure in a recent UCLA survey.
This is just one step away.